RichieGoodtimes :

The only reason you're getting so much slack is cause you keep fighting back, man. That's the real deal. This place is fun.

2002-07-19 15:05:33

TBM :

What it all comes down to is that lame is lame and by no means are my eyes pleased. So, by the power of Greyskull, damn these EYES!

2002-07-19 14:13:40

kozik :

dude..Alien Skin....perhaps the gayest...

2002-07-19 13:10:55

RichieGoodtimes :

Blatant Photoshop Abuse. The design police demand that you uninstall Photoshop from your computer at once or you will be levied an $8 dollar fine. Photoshop is not a toy, kids.

2002-07-19 13:09:18

Unflown :

Well, I agree that this conversation is relentless but in fairness I'll respond, as it is me that Fylar took issue with... You're right-- there is a bunch of ripping on here. Read around, it gets addressed. I made a pretty simple statement and you got pretty pissed. Maybe you oughta question why. Im not changing my opinion and I sure aint sorry. As for calling me a hypocrite, well thats not cool either. Fuck off.

2002-07-19 13:03:40

kevin jones :

p.s. drop shadows are "the devil"

2002-07-19 09:51:50

uncle charlie :

Hey that TOWER card represents the World Trade Center!! anybody catch that?

2002-07-19 09:50:02

kevin jones :

and yes, we have had this argument too many times on this site, so lets just leave it at that eh.

2002-07-19 09:47:55

kevin jones :

a wise man once said: Use obscurely & Alter images significantly most seasoned designers here follow these rules, not only to protect themselves, but also to respect the original creator. you could have easily redrawn the cards, and made them your own eh. now as far as composition of this poster is concerning, may i suggest a little reading on typography, and ill let you know that the world of graphic design doesnt begin and end with photoshop. just some helpful suggestions, and thought i would let you know that there is a big difference between appropriating images RESPONSIBLY, and outright swiping.

2002-07-19 09:47:19

rockologist :

i don't think anyone wants to touch it because we've had this argument here sooo many times.

2002-07-19 09:46:01

JGex :

:lol: ;-) :lol:

2002-07-19 08:11:15

seripop :

both

2002-07-19 07:56:34

JGex :

What's shitty? The poster or the argument?

2002-07-19 07:39:02

seripop :

this is really shitty. :-x

2002-07-19 07:31:08

Sash :

nah, you're right. i was just testing you. the tarots were done like in 1902 by Pamela Colman Smith. i thought you were saying "ripped off" like they were new or recent cards. i agree w/ your points on design, though.

2002-07-18 19:19:26

Unflown :

Who got ripped off was the person who illustrated all the tarot cards. They are the entire message. Otherwise all you have is some desktop publishing calling itself design. Its one thing to lift, to collage, to recontextualize, etc. This is hack ripping. The illustrator did some cool work, though, whenever it was done. The tower and the swords illos are crazy cool folksy. And on the off-chance that the work is legit, my apologies.

2002-07-18 17:25:23

Sash :

just curious-- who got ripped off?

2002-07-18 16:21:48

Unflown :

Not cool to outright rip folks off.

2002-07-18 16:19:15

 0         0               Tweet   

BB Code for forums:
  HTML for websites: