|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
tappin_dilz : |
basically, sleeve, just two different styles. I like your type way better than i like the illustration. I think you should somehow play the type of the image or what-have-you. yo holla at yr boy! |
2004-06-21 09:44:24 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
steve_sleeve : |
yes, apologies to todd, as i fucked up when selecting the designer from the drop-down menu. it will get changed at some point soon, i'm thinking.
so, as a totally amateur poster maker, i'd like to ask what makes the type "meh" with the illustration. is it because the styles are too different? or is it just a shitty job with the typesetting? hook it up dudes |
2004-06-18 23:28:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seripop : |
nice illustration, type is rather meh |
2004-06-18 10:17:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
steve w : |
Are you Nate of rails and wings? |
2004-06-18 09:36:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
slater : |
um, although this is pretty cool, it's not mine and is under my stuff and I believe it should be under Steve Sleeve's stuff. |
2004-06-18 09:34:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
steve w : |
Sharkopter!!! |
2004-06-18 09:15:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ferg2001 : |
personally i think the type is bad...mainly because it doesnt jive with the illo. ... the illo has mad flavour though. |
2004-06-18 09:01:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jasoncross : |
funky...the type is great...and the imagery is at first fucked up...but has a edge to it that works well on a screenprint...i really hope this was screenprinted. |
2004-06-18 07:34:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
